The new era of the Mustang that came from this is the overhead cam v8. Only a 4.6 liter, it created large amounts of power for its size. Between the loss of the 5.0 and the complete body redesign, in 1996 the Mustang GT was unrecognizable compared to the earlier generations of Fox body Mustangs. This new era may have been brought on by legislation, but was much needed. Many people had the opinion that Mustang was falling behind in technology, and some believed the car to be serverly underpowered. Some were sad in this change, but many welcomed it. The major thing it signified is loss of not only needing wrenches to work on your car, but a laptop as well.
14 comments:
I still think the best year for mustangs was '69. Those were some good cars.
I prefer the 67 GT 500 in my opinion.
Yeaa I realised that i had said the wrong year right after I posted that. The '69 was a good year for the Camero's.
I think that the best quality of car is the 2010 hemmice Camero, with a pro flow super charger.
the 95 is alright, but i personaly think that the 72 chevelle is the weay to go. It is the best old school muscle car out there.
I don't have a clue about some of the things that you are saying but I did learn a lot. It also seems that you guys know your cars and I think that is a great thing to know in the future.
very interesting.. can tell what your passionate about ;) i agree... 69' was a gooood year.
i think the 69 nova is a better muscle car. not really a ford fan!!!
Are you one who welcomed this change? Does needing a laptop create significantly more work for repair?
It both creates and lessens the aomount of work. It's a mixed blessing, because it helps with the amount of time needed trouble shooting a problem, but yet eveything being connected to wires makes both the disassembly and the reassembly more of a hassel.
It both creates and lessens the aomount of work. It's a mixed blessing, because it helps with the amount of time needed trouble shooting a problem, but yet eveything being connected to wires makes both the disassembly and the reassembly more of a hassel.
It both creates and lessens the aomount of work. It's a mixed blessing, because it helps with the amount of time needed trouble shooting a problem, but yet eveything being connected to wires makes both the disassembly and the reassembly more of a hassel.
It both creates and lessens the aomount of work. It's a mixed blessing, because it helps with the amount of time needed trouble shooting a problem, but yet eveything being connected to wires makes both the disassembly and the reassembly more of a hassel.
It both creates and lessens the aomount of work. It's a mixed blessing, because it helps with the amount of time needed trouble shooting a problem, but yet eveything being connected to wires makes both the disassembly and the reassembly more of a hassel.
Post a Comment